On 1/8/2012 1:03 PM, harry wrote:
On Jan 8, 9:48 am, The Daring
wrote:
On 1/8/2012 2:29 AM, harry wrote:





On Jan 7, 10:38 pm, The Daring
wrote:
On 1/7/2012 11:55 AM, Kurt Ullman wrote:

In . net,
"Mr. Austerity""PrintMo.Money" wrote:

With this latest Shotgun Sarah news don't be surprised if can
get a law requiring single mom's to have a double barrel 12 gauge in
their trailer home.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/04...lls-intruder-w...
spatcher-on-phone/

Actually it had been tried as a city in the 80s tried pass an ordinance
that everybody had to buy a firearm (don't recall right off which kind)
or pay a fine. That was tossed (quite rightly) because you also have a
right to not own a firearm under the second amendment. Another reason I
don't like the laws that say private property owners like malls must let
people carry whether they want them to or not.

Kennesaw, Georgia in 1982, not "everyone" was required to own a gun. You
can read a bit about it he

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennesaw,_Georgia#Gun_law

Copied from your link about compulsary gun owning.Duf

Statistical analysis of [the] data over a longer period of time did
not show any evidence that [the law] reduced the rate of home
burglaries [in Kennesaw.

Which is what I've always contended.
Absolute proof.

It was WiKi and the articles are often slanted one way or another so
when I seriously want accurate information, I read more than one source.
There are official government sites that have the actual statistics on
crime in the area. I simply posted about the city that passed the law,
not the merits of the law. ^_^

So you only believe it when it suits you? :-)

Not so, it's like a conservative talk show host out of Atlanta who
always says "Don't believe anything I say unless you can verify it
on your own." I like him, he's hysterically funny. ^_^

I try to look at several sources and am always willing to stand
corrected. I've never claimed to be omniscient but I'm not quite
gullible because I know everyone has an agenda. ^_^

TDD