View Single Post
  #205   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
[email protected] clare@snyder.on.ca is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default OT way OT but GOOD for Mom!

On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:55:16 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 1/7/2012 7:33 AM, Larry W wrote:
In articleAdWdndH7eMJaPJrSnZ2dnUVZ5sidnZ2d@giganews. com,
Leonlcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
On 1/6/2012 4:55 PM, Larry W wrote:
In ,
wrote:

I'm in the choir, and well aware of, and completely fine with, the
justification for felony murder charges in the above scenario, but you
do see the stark difference?

You really have to stretch logic, common sense and reality to invoke
felony murder charges in the case I remarked upon.

Without being familiar with the specific laws where it occurred,
how can you say?



Common sense.

You are riding in the car with a friend, he runs a red light gets hit
and is killed. You are charged with murder because you were riding with
out wearing a seat belt????


Now do you see the logic?


No. Again, I am not a lawyer, and not familiar with the specific laws
of your state or Oklahoma, but running a red light is not even a
misdemeanor, let alone a felony.


It is breaking a law. Therefore you are liable for being punished in
some way for being with him.



Only if "felonious intent" - like trying to ram someone, or escape
police pursuit.