On 1/7/2012 8:47 AM, Han wrote:
Larry wrote in
:

On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:28:22 -0600, wrote:

On 1/6/2012 6:54 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:44:07 -0600, wrote:

On 1/6/2012 4:28 PM, Edward A. Falk wrote:
In article_OmdncUKb_QjiJrSnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@giganews. com,
wrote:

None of the news reports have mentioned it, but the dead guy's
partner will be charged with felony murder.

I have no sympathy for the dude, but that's the kind of
ridiculous overreaching by prosecutors that defies logic and
commonsense.

Not in the slightest. If you commit a crime, and it causes
someone to die, that's murder. This is practically the textbook
case.

Nonsense. This scenario is far from from the "textbook case" ...
read the laws in the various states and you will quickly understand
that this particular scenario is neither a "textbook case", nor
does it fit with the crafted distinction in all States that have a
felony murder statute.

What it is a textbook example of "legal fiction" ... look it up.

What is your suggested punishment for the 2nd idiot?

Involuntary manslaughter.

Works for me.


That would work for me, but it does dilute the statute of felony murder.
I still think convict of felony murder, but not the maximum sentence.

Who was murdered? If a police officer shoots a bank robber inside the
bank are the customers that may have spoken to the robber, before he
pulled out his gun, accessories to the murder?

Until we actually know the facts lets not guess at what did or may have
happened.