On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:14:00 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 1/6/2012 10:01 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:40:23 -0600, Leonlcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 1/6/2012 5:16 PM, HeyBub wrote:
Leon wrote:



No ****! Why should the second guy be charged with murder?? No
murder was committed. Smells like a liberal. Someone is going to
pay for killing the worthless POC and we will never make it stick on
the young woman.

Better check your definitions.

Homicide = Killing of a human being by the actions of another
Murder = Homicide with premeditation and malice or homicide committed during
the commission of a felony. Note the person committing the homicide need not
be the felon (as in defense of self).

I under stand the laws say it is so but what moron made that law up.

Is it possible that they want people to stop committing felonies?
I think it's probably a good law in most cases.

I think he should be prosecuted for assisted burglary, not felony murder.

What about the rape? Is there any doubt in your mind that if she had
-not- stopped them, they both would have raped her, then possibly
killed both her and the baby?

The problem is that now he'll go to jail, spend time with much more
hardened criminals, and learn how to do things right the next time.
sigh

Too bad she didn't have slugs and the guys were stacked up in the
doorway. It would have made things much simpler.

--
Worry is a misuse of imagination.
-- Dan Zadra