View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
harry harry is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,188
Default Panetta talking tough on Iran

On Dec 20, 5:16*pm, "
wrote:
On Dec 20, 11:52*am, "Stormin Mormon"

wrote:
Yes, we're beyond broke.


There are some groups of people who wish our death, regardless of anything
we do or don't do. Nuke em back might not be a sufficient deterrant.


Exactly. *How well did ignoring Hitler, the Japanese
or Al-Qaeda work?
And with the WMDs of today, ignoring what goes on in the
rest of the world is simply reckless. *As for nuking them back, how
about a country like North Korea? *They already have missles that
can hit Asia and are close or possibly already within range of
Hawaii. *The country is already in the stone age
with little worth nuking. One fine morning some little nut job
gets ****ed off, doesn't give a damn and pushes the launch
button. *If HI or LA is in ruins, seems getting even isn't the
best solution. * Funny too, isn't it that the libs always condemn
US military action as being done out of revenge, yet that is
exactly what is being proposed here, instead of preventing
the disaster to begin with?


The wars with Japan and Al Qaeda were started by the USA. As will be
the open war with Iran.
The USA needs perpetual war to further enrich it's wealthy
kleptocrats.
Now you have pulled out of/buggered up Iraq, a new war is needed.