View Single Post
  #128   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
John Larkin John Larkin is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,420
Default Very low power dynamo (alternator actually).

On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:16:34 -0500, Bill Palmer
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:09:37 -0800 John Larkin
wrote in Message id:
:

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:28:55 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:34:13 -0600, John Fields
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:23:34 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:01:09 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:37:41 -0600, John Fields
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:18:22 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:

[snip]

So, say something new about alternators.

---
Just to give you something to feed on?

I don't think so.

I'll say something new...

Perhaps Larkin would be happy to address Ian's question, "What I was
wondering was whether its possible to get more energy into the battery
by letting the generator output voltage stretch its legs so to speak
and convert the excessive voltage down with a buck converter"?

How about it, JL? Address the original question with your wisdom.
Dazzle us with your brilliance. We're waiting.

...Jim Thompson

We're still waiting, though it's no surprise... push the question back
to technical details only, and Larkin enters "silent mode" :-)

---
Indeed.

I can't recall a single instance where he boasts about his circuits
and shows his work, although he's certainly critical about me showing
mine.

Something about that posting the math and working through the problem
is something I shouldn't be doing in order to prove that what I'm
talking about is right, mathematically, while out of the other side of
his mouth he extols the virtues of the inexactness of qualitative
exposition where _his_ "work" is concerned.
---

He'll not be heard of again in regard to this topic... except perhaps
he may toss a few snarky "old hens" or "cluck-clucks" our way.

---
That sure seems to be his wont - name-calling - when he's faced with
having to reply to anything where he has to admit to error or which
makes him feel uncomfortable because he can see it leading to where he
dare not go.
---

But he'll have no technical answer, for he has no clue.

---
Be fair.

I've given JL ample opportunity to answer the TECHNICAL question... he
won't/can't.


You've killfiled me, you incredible moron. Of course you can't see
what I post.

Incredible moron!


Perhaps JT has one of Highly-Evolved Super-Special Kill Filters that only
allow technical stuff though?

Ha! Bet you didn't consider THAT one!


Or he has a Highly-Evolved Super-Special Kill Filter that only allows
personal little-old-lady my-o-my he-said-she-said whining and clucking
stuff through.

Ha! Bet you didn't consider THAT one!

John