"Forrest" wrote in message
...

Sorry if I'm not using the correct protocol for posting .... don't do it
all that much.

"Home Guy" said:

How can you explain that you have the right to own a gun - but not a
machine gun?

Or a rocket launcher or bazooka or high explosives or all sorts of other
deadly / destructive products?

Why aren't you crying foul that you can't buy hand grenades or land
mines?

What you said is so absurd that it boggles the mind. So, I guess if a
person is allowed to have a knife and a baseball bat in their home for
self defense, then with your reasoning, it should somehow be escalated to
something like, "then why not allow a nuclear bomb as well"? What gives
with that? How does your mind come up with such a conclusion?
Do you apply this escalation to everything?
How you get from a reasonable point (A) a gun to defend yourself and
family to (B) then anything goes? I'm sorry, I just don't get it.


You're not supposed to
It's dishonest argument