On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:05:55 -0800 (PST), BobR
wrote:

On Nov 23, 4:33*pm, "
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:57:20 -0800 (PST), BobR
wrote:





On Nov 23, 10:13*am, "
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:16:33 -0500, "Stormin Mormon"

wrote:
I think the legislators aren't allowed to consider
the cost of implementing. Just to consider the
revenue benfits from the taxes. So, the people
who write the law don't have any concern for
how much it costs private industry to comply
with their new law.

No, it's really simpler than that. *If they don't see it, it doesn't exist.
IOW, legislators are stupid, but you knew that.

Yes, most legislators are rather stupid but then you are showing a few
signs of the same problem.

You've proven that you're illiterate. *Seems you should start, here, by
loaloking in the mirror.


Sorry but you are clearly clueless about the available software and
what it can do.

You're 100% wrong, but that is no surprise to anyone either. It's not what
*SOFTWARE* can do. It's what the garbage-in can do. Morons like you are
easily convinced of SMOP.

Oh, and the problem has already been solved many times over.

Oh, no, it most certainly has not. *States can't even keep it straight.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bull****.

Wrong, as always.

There are already companies that collect sales tax over the internet
and have been for years. They are required to because they have both
B&M as well as internet sales so they don't have an excuse.

....and they *all* have problems with the corner cases.