On 11/21/2011 7:29 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:

Well, that's a bit of an extreem analogy, and I'm not sure it really applies
to this discussion. Your analogy references illegal activities, while Gass'
activities are completely within the law - regardless of how distasteful
they may be to some.

Therein lies the problem ... his methods may be "legal", but many are
arguably unethical in a capitalistic system, which must have a
moral/ethical component to survive (in the sense that he games the
system at others expense).

Not surprising in that Gass is also a member of the legal profession,
which writes the rules blurring the distinctions between what is
"legal", while completely disregarding whether they be moral, ethical,
or otherwise.

A lawyers business model is ultimately based on gaming the judicial
system, which they themselves have a disproportionate hand in authoring.

--
www.eWoodShop.com
Last update: 4/15/2010
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)
http://gplus.to/eWoodShop