On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:12:01 -0800, Hawke
wrote:

On 11/17/2011 8:30 PM, Benny Fishhole wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:37 -0500,
wrote:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ge-filed-57000-page-tax-return-paid-no-taxes-14-billion-profits_609137.html

General Electric, one of the largest corporations in America, filed a
whopping 57,000-page federal tax return earlier this year but didn't
pay taxes on $14 billion in profits. The return, which was filed
electronically, would have been 19 feet high if printed out and
stacked.

...

You wouldn't have to pay taxes either if you sucked Obama's dick,
instead of Gunner's.

sigh, another rcm troll



Yeah, look who's talking, and what's wrong with GE not paying any taxes?
It's the little people like you that should be paying them not our
corporations. They need lower taxes. Don't you remember your republican
talking points? Business needs a tax cut because they pay too much, just
like GE does.

By lowering their taxes we have to raise it on you and all the other
stupid low earners. You just don't get it. The rich aren't supposed to
pay taxes; it's the ordinary people who are supposed to foot the bills
for the country. You're supposed to just be happy that there are people
who have tons of money. They earned it so they should keep it. You and
people of your class should pay the country's bills, not them. I don't
get why you can't keep the republican agenda straight. It never changes.

Hawke


Did you read the article? They said that 9 billion came from foreign
activities that weren't liable to US tax laws. which is not to say
that no tax was paid to a foreign entity. Next the article says that a
further 5 billion was exempted because it came form investments in low
cost housing, green energy, depreciation, etc.

So, apparently, in spite of your quote the other day about green
energy you feel that there should be no US government interest in
developing green energy? Inspite of your frequent remarks about the
little guy there should be no US government interest in developing or
building low cost housing? You feel that depreciation of property, the
recovering of monies used to purchase real property is not valid?
Depreciation, I might comment, was been an accepted accounting
practice under the Democrats....


--
John B.