On Nov 11, 9:46*am, Davey wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:40:32 +0000





Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Huge
writes
On 2011-11-10, Davey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:24:35 -0000
"Lieutenant Scott" wrote:

On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:00:04 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

Ian Jackson wrote:
In message
m,
"dennis@home" writes

"Chris J Dixon" wrote in message
...
Jules Richardson wrote:

On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:38:12 +0000, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:

pid=14046&loc=P&catid=110.0

It's like photocopying cold to make it warmer...

Perhaps it comes from the same school of thought that tells
us electric current flows in the opposite direction to the
electrons.

Oh come on, everyone knows its the holes that go that way.

And that light bulbs work by sucking the darkness in.

*shrug* Its a theory. But really, what isn't?

(serious deep question)

It's a stupid theory. *The bulb would get bigger and bigger with
all that darkness in it.

It's dark. You can't see it.

Don't be silly. It's piped away down the wires to the power station,
where it's converted into clouds. That's why it's cloudier in the
winter when more people have their lights on.

The process of piping the darkness back to the power station is not
100% efficient.

So that's why the government is reducing the feed-back tariff for solar
power generation?
--
Davey.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Apparently there was a cap on the money.It has been reached much
sooner than expected. Everybody now knows their savings with be going
down the drain due to inflation this next few years sothere has been a
big rush on. There is an even bigger rush now.
I was not aware there was a cap.