Thread: Reflecting cold
View Single Post
  #89   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
harry harry is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,188
Default Reflecting cold

On Nov 10, 8:29*pm, "Lieutenant Scott" wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:38:57 -0000, dennis@home wrote:

"Martin Brown" wrote in message
...
On 09/11/2011 20:20, dennis@home wrote:


"Martin Brown" wrote in message
...


It is a corollary of the famous E = mc^2 equation.


And where does that say that if you increase the energy in a system you
increase its mass?


Are you really so thick that you cannot rearrange the equation?


m = E/c^2


c^2 being a rather large number makes the change in mass effect small for
modest energies but it is not always negligible.


So if you move an object on Earth to a larger distance you increase the
potential energy.
Which one actually increases in mass, the Earth or the object?


I'd say neither. *That's POTENTIAL energy.

--http://petersparrots.comhttp://petersphotos.com

If trains stop at train stations, what happens at workstations?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If you move an object away from Earth you increase its potential
energy.
If you accelarate and object, its mass increases .
As it gets to light speed it's mass becomes infinity. Which is why
FTL speeds are impossible.
Unless of course the object had no mass to start with.
Hence the neutrino conundrum.