Mark & Juanita writes:

eir
definition of "rich" (often now referred to as someone making more than
$100k per year)

$100K doesn't make it. Maybe twice or three times that for a minimum of a
decade?
hus you have one candidate
who made money the old fashioned way (he married it) and another who is
a multi-hundred millionaire by nature of sueing for the "oppressed" and
keeping 60% of their winnings telling those who make more than $100k how
they should suck it up and "pay their fair share".

And the final candidate (of realistic candidates) also made his bucks the
old-fashioned way: he inherited it.

BTW, I think most tort attorneys get to keep about 35-50%, not 60%. Bad enough
that the exaggeration seems unnecessary.

Charlie Self
"There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured with what is right in
America." William J. Clinton

http://hometown.aol.com/charliediy/m.../business.html