On Nov 2, 1:54*am, "Josepi" wrote:

I ask you to show me one example and your response is "Put-up or shut-up!"?
Pathetic.

You're the one making the claim:

"Some cancers alternative medicines have better results than
"conventional quackery" "

You make the claim, you provide the evidence!

Your definition is flawed the "conventional medicine" only shows what worked
for their "worked better than placebo" tests, as I indicated previously.

I don't know what you mean here / what your point is, please can you
clarify.

A majority of medical testing does not use placebos or double blinded studies.

Bull****. Prove it. I would imagine that in the US market, with it's
hungry lawyers, ANY chink in the armour of testing is going to be
ruthlessly exploited. Your previous sentence is laughable.

Much of it uses the same study methods as Alternative medicine techniques..
You have been duped by the Medical Mafia.

Ha ha ha, whatever. You keep saying things you can't prove! If you
think you can, please present your evidence. I'm happy to evaluate new
evidence.

I stick with what works. Sometimes it is "conventional" and sometimes
intelligent medicine techniques.

So conventional medicine isn't intelligent? Can you please give me a
few examples of what you would regard as 'intelligent' medicine. I am
genuinely interested in your thoughts here.

I don't like using "better than placebo"
techniques when some have died using them.

Yeah, and people who have used bull**** of all bull****s - homoeopathy
- have died as a result too! So what's your point? That people get
sick and die? No, really? Do they?!

Get your swine flu vaccine, yet?

No, why would I? Are you assuming that I need one?

I think you're a troll.