10 cheapest BEST cities to live.... and to run a mfr'g bidniss??
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 06:05:51 -0500, "HeyBub" wrote:
Allen Drake wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:43:01 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote:
Allen Drake wrote:
They are in the Jobs Bill that the right refuses to pass. The right
has been obstructionist since the beginning.
Hate to break it to you Sparky, but the Republicans tried to vote on
the president's jobs bill but the Senate Majority Leader had his
caucus vote to NOT bring the bill up for a vote. The president's
bill has languished in the Senate since the president sent it over.
Since the Democrats have a majority in the Senate, it's a confusing
wonder why they continue to deny a vote or even allow a markup.
Meanwhile, in the House, the president's bill has ONE sponsor and NO
co-sponsors.
The republicans won't vote on anything that raises revenue. You know
little about law making. The right will bring down the country before
they give Obama anything.
#1 I know "little about lawmaking"? Hmm. In my youth, I was an
Administrative Aide to a U.S. Senator. I KNOW how laws are made.
#2 The Republicans have NEVER said they were opposed to increasing revenue.
Their view is that the best way to raise revenue is by cutting taxes. This
technique has worked every time it's been tried.
Now tell me sparky, who do you support to run against him?
I have a candidate in mind. Here are some of his qualifications. He came to
Texas with only a few million in his pocket and made good. Elected as the
first Republican congressman in Texas since Reconstruction, then re-elected
with no opposition. Director of Central Intelligence, U.S. Ambassador to the
United Nations, Chairman of the Republican National Committee, U.S.
Ambassador to the Republic of China. That should be enough, but he also
served eight years as Vice-President of the United States and four as
President.
So, my support for a candidate to run against Obama runs the gamut, from the
aforementioned individual to a dead cat.
|