View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Bob Eager[_2_] Bob Eager[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,076
Default Good place to ask about XP memory problems

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:36:44 +0100, dennis@home wrote:

Having written a tiny OS for the 68000 (see
http://www.clothears.org.uk) I can state that it's a much better
processor than the 8086 ever was. Just a shame that the 68008 wasn't
out in time for IBM to use in the original PC instead of the 8088.


AFAICS there wasn't much in it.
I wrote in 8086 assembler for the 8086 board I designed. It wasn't any
more difficult than assembler for the 68000.


Unless you wanted data areas 64kB, of course.

The 80186 board I designed was programmed using PL/M and used RMX86.


The 80186 was designed to be really easy, so perhaps you might have
managed that.

The STREAMS drivers and other C code I wrote was horrible to do, C is
the worst language I have used.


It requires a competent programmer, you see.


--
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

*lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor