On Oct 21, 4:08*pm, Hawke wrote:

You proved my point for me. The accusation was the Clinton people
"trashed" the White House. That sounds pretty severe to me. So what
really happened? Here is the list you gave: 62 keyboards, 26 cell
phones, two cameras, ten door knobs, and some medallions and signs were
removed.

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't even call taking 62 keyboards and
26 cell phones "damage" to the White House at all. But the fact is the
report doesn't show any real damage done or that there was recklessness
or disrespectful treatment of the White House itself at all.

You read the report and I did and to me what it said is that the claims
that the White House was trashed was a lie. From what I see in the
report whatever was done was minimal at best. Is that not right?

Hawke



You have a convient memory. Your statement was

"Two things: first the story you just told above is bogus and was
refuted
by numerous sources. There was no damage done to the white house by
the
Clintons. I'm surprised you didn't know that story was false."

Note the words NO DAMAGE. No means none. It does not mean only
$20,000 in damages. $20,000 is way above the threshold from
misdemeanor to felony.

Dan