View Single Post
  #363   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
harry harry is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,188
Default OT Wall street occupation.

On Oct 20, 1:55*am, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 19, 6:41 pm, "
wrote:





On Oct 19, 4:25 pm, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 19, " wrote:


Well said and excellent points. *I've said for a long time that
what we need to do is get free market principles applied to
healthcare. *We should be asking the question if free markets
can supply corn flakes, cars, and even life or auto insurance
at reasonable prices, what's wrong with healthcare?


I'd say that it's people's view of healthcare. *That and lawyers.
Both the ones chasing ambulances and the ones chasing campaign
contributions.


I'd like to see a committee put together with some top business
CEOs, like Andy Grove, Jack Welch, etc to research it and
figure out what exactly is wrong and how we can fix it.


Instead, we just created another big govt progrm that is
going to do nothing to stop spiraling costs. *Those costs
are ultimately still going to be paid by most of us, either
directly or through taxes.


If Grove and Welch's investigation turned up a report that said that
insurance is a basic need for all people, and as such a nationwide
program was required (broken up into smaller administration groups/
regions/whatever), and that a national/state per capita tax was
required to pay for it, would you be okay with that?


Unlike many conservatives, I don't have a problem with the
govt requiring mandatory healthcare coverage for everyone.
I do have a problem with the way it's being done under
Obamacare.


Fair enough. *How do you think the Supreme Court will divide on the
issue?

My reasoning goes like this. *The only free market solution to
not having universal healthcare coverage and the burden
not being placed unfairly on taxpayers is to refuse to
treat people who can't pay.


That smacks of NIMBY and I've-Got-Mine-Tough-On-You. *To make it fair
all the way around, I'd extend that to include refusing healthcare
coverage to people that can pay, but who are so old and/or ill that it
is simply a useless extension of life. *Check out the statistics on
end of life surgery and procedures. *The amount spent is absurd.
Nobody is supposed to live forever.



I think you'll change your tune when you get a bit older and someone
wants to chuck YOU on the scrap heap.