On 10/19/2011 5:14 PM, Han wrote:
Leonlcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in
:

On 10/19/2011 4:09 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 10/19/2011 2:57 PM, Leon wrote:
On 10/19/2011 12:52 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 10/19/2011 9:23 AM, J. Clarke wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/18/2011 5:31 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:40:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote:

Do you seriously think no one has a right to make individual
decisions
in matters of procreation?

I think training, testing, and licensing for prospective parents
could
well be an improvement - but it'll never happen.

That wasn't my question.

Do you seriously think no one has a right to make individual
decisions in matters of procreation?

The Supreme Court seems to think that individuals can decide to
not procreate, and the government can in certain circumstances
decide for individuals that they may not procreate.

Please provide an example.

I believe that was when the government was introducing a birth
control under the surface of the skin. I do not recall the
circumstances but IIRC it was for incarcerated women.

1. Is there any evidence of this, or are you just repeating gossip?

It was on the national news some years back. Google it.

Depo provira or something like that sticks of plastic that leaked
something like the pill.

I'm the one saying there is a right to make decisions about whether to
procreate. I have challenged those who contend no such right exists for
examples to support their position. It's their job, not mine, to prove
their point.