On Oct 18, 11:45*am, RicodJour wrote:
On Oct 18, "Stormin Mormon"
wrote:



Yes, that's the same totally outraged, and totally clueless
woman. I thought it was really indication, that she refused
to answer the question Jay kept asking. I think she knew
she'd brand herself as a socialist.

Didn't see the show, but it sounds like you enjoyed your
entertainment. *That's good.

Watching Hannity, or any teevee show with a slant may be fun,

Where is there a TV news program that doesn't have a slant?
At least Hannity, unlike NBC, CBS, etc is honest about it.
And he does regularly have on well known liberals who
disagree with him.



but it's
not educational nor meaningful.

While I'm not a big fan of Hannity, I have to disagree
that it's not educational.




*It's exactly the same as watching
Maury or Springer to get a read on how normal people behave. *You
won't find the answer there.

I don't see how you can compare Hannity, where they
are debating budget deficits to Springer having on
sluts talking about having sex with their uncle.




What you will find is that your personal predilection, the one that
caused you to tune in that particular program in the first place, will
be confirmed. *All will be right with the world.

If it works for you...

R

PS *Jon Stewart or Steven Colbert - comedians - would destroy anybody
in a televised debate. *They'd even let you pick the side they should
be on.

I've seen Stewart engage Bill O'Reilly and he sure didn't come close
to destroying him. Gee, funny that you criticize Hannity, but
obviously
watch those two. If Hannity is Springer, then what are those two
clowns?