On Sep 25, 6:20*pm, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Trevor Wilson"

**I suggest you read this:

http://www.choice.com.au/reviews-and...ergy-and-water...

** A laughably worthless test, not in any way related to normal use.

Something the rabid green lunatics atChoiceare FAMOUS *for *!!!

Look at the pic *- *all the CFLs are suspended in mid air !!

No light fittings, not even a ceiling above them.

The room is air conditioned too.

And *NO *on /off *cycling at all *!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


http://www.jenman.com.au/news_article.php?id=262

This article tends to reinforce what you said about Choice.



Not *ONE *of the *KNOWN *issues with CFLs will be revealed in such a test.

BTW:

One reason thatChoicedid not cycle the CFLs is that they found it *VERY
difficult to do.

If you try to switch on 10 or more CFLs at once, it will trip the lighting
circuit breaker ( 8 amp) regularly *- * with over 200 it will not even be
possible at all.

CFLs have large inrush surges, up to 20 amps peak or more for long enough to
active the magnetic trip on lighting breakers.

Looks like the CFLs in that test were powered from a wall outlet (ie using a
16 amp breaker) and brought on in groups of 10 ( using several multi-way
power boards) until they were all lit and left like that for 12 months.

Total ********.

The other green lunatic drivel quoted in the article makes me wanna puke.

.... Phil