kreed wrote:
On Sep 28, 2:24 pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote:
kreed wrote:
**I note your continued inability to answer my questions and deal
with the facts presented. I accept your admission that you are
wrong.

I accept that you are making an impossible demand, by doing the
equivalent of demanding that I provide proof that facts (in your
belief) that the easter bunny, angels, ghosts etc DON'T exist.

**Absolute twaddle. I haev presented, in the form of the IPCC
reports, clear, unequivocal evidence that shows that AGW is the best
explanation for the warming we are experiencing. You, OTOH, have
demonstrated that you have not read the IPCC reports. You have also
failed to answer any of my questions WRT this issue. Your analogy,
like all your previous analogies, is utterly bereft of logic. If you
feel the IPCC AR4 is faulty, then you need to show where and how the
report is faulty. A good place for you to start, is to read the
damned report.

This

cannot be 100% proven as fact,

**Since there is no evidence of those things, a reasonable person
can assume that they don't exist. However, in the case of the IPCC
AR4, we have:

* Clear, unequivocal evidence that the planet is warming at a faster
rate at any time in the last 600,000 years.
* Clear, unequivocal evidence that the planet is experiencing a rate
of CO2 rise that is faster than at any time in the last 600,000
years. * Clear, unequivocal evidence that the rate of temperature
rise has been closely linked to CO2 rise in the past.
* Clear, unequivocal evidence that Solar variability fails to
account for the temperature rise over the last 200 years.

but I doubt any normal adult fully

believes in it and rightly would laugh themselves silly if you tried
to tell them otherwise that you had proof because you listened to
vested interests.

**WHAT VESTED INTERESTS? You keep claiming that people have been
paid off, that there are vested interests and that corruption is
rife in the IPCC, NASA, the US EPA, The US Academy of Sciences, The
BoM, The Australian Academy of Science, the UK MET, The Royal
Swedish Academy of Science and a host of other reputable
organisations, BUT you have failed, despite repeated requests, to
provide evidence to support you wild and potentially libellous
claims.

As they say: "Put up or shut up."

If you have evidence to support your claims of corruption, present
it.

As usual, you will fail to provide evidence to support your wild
claims.



I accept that you have been over time due to either mental illness
(as told by other posters on this group in the past), or the victim
of lifelong brainwashing that you accept without question belief in
certain things that vested interests defecate out that you cannot
ever see past this, and it is always right regardless of the facts.

**********. I have a logical, rational, critical thinking brain. I
accept that which has been proven by science. Nothign else. I note
that you have failed to present a single shred of scientific
evidence to support your wild claims.

Now who is being an idiot?

The one who accepts the solid science, from reputable organisations,
or the one who believes the ******** promulgated by Alan Jones,
George Pell and Tony Abbott?



I guess you would have to be that way to be into the audiophile
hi-fi business. Unless you believed in the shonky claims thrown
about by some manufacturers and their "proof", it probably is much
harder to sell such stuff to the gullible.

**Strawman duly noted. You have zero idea of my business practices.



There are loads like you in various crackpot movements be they the
greens, feminism etc. You are not hard to see through. The words and
manner of delivery give it away

**I'll say again: Sumbit your proof of your wild accusations.



as Phil would say. **** Off.

**An expected response from a person who has no answers.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au


Submit real proof, not paid for and discredited "proof", failing
that, go away.

**Inability to provide even a tiny shred of supporting evidence is duly
noted.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au