kreed wrote:
On Sep 28, 2:25 pm, "Phil Allison" wrote:
"Jeff Liebermann"



"Six committees investigated the allegations and published
reports, finding no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct."
which is correct. There was no fraud or misconduct. What I saw was a
substantial amount of effort expended in removing and invalidating
inconsistent data and data that did not fit the predefined
conclusions.

** Cleaning up data is otherwise known as selecting your evidence - a
logical fallacy of the highest order. It is completely dishonest and
scientifically worthless.

By selecting ones evidence, it becomes possible to "prove" any
conclusion you like and posters on usenet do it all the time.

Dunno what definition of "scientific fraud" you think is right, but
quietly removing evidence that does not suit an hypothesis has gotta
be an example of scientific dishonesty.

.... Phil


So true. They should be drummed out of their position, have their
credentials stripped and be prosecuted.
This won't happen though

**LOL! Nor should it. Accusing several dozen of the best scientific
organisations on the planet of fraud, demands some pretty solid evidence.
Thus far, you've presented exactly nothing.

Still waiting for some answers.......


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au