View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
Arfa Daily Arfa Daily is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,772
Default The nuts are becoming dominant



"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 04:44:29 -0500, Jeffrey Angus
wrote:

On 9/12/2011 1:31 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
The standard joke is that the only legal way to
interview a prospective employee is over the telephone.


How do you interview a guy who stutters then?
Jeff


Easy. By cell phone or with my VoIP phone (w/o QoS). Either will
make everyone sound like they were gargling ball bearings. The
stutter would never be noticed.

The problem with such ordinances is that they are being interpreted as
the employer is not allowed to discriminate on ANY basis. Also,
"appearance discrimination" is being interpreted as a form of racial
discriminiation". Tattoos are just a minor part of the mess. To the
best of my limited knowledge, there have been no judgements solely
involving tattoos in Santa Cruz, yet.

Drivel: Military Tattoo Policy Summary:
http://www.atlantictattooremoval.com/military_tattoo_policies.html

--
Jeff Liebermann


They're looking at changing the 'rules' regarding visible tattoos on police
officers over here at the moment. Some bright spark has suggested that
putting them on view by allowing officers that have them to wear
short-sleeved shirts, will somehow improve their street cred, and allow them
to relate better to the feral little scrotes that they're trying to police
in our out-of-control towns. It's already getting hard to tell the officers
from the offenders, what with the paramilitary 'uniforms', complete with
bovver boots and baseball caps over shaven heads. It'll be impossible if we
have all the tats on display, as well ... :-\

Arfa