On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:15:35 +0700, john B.
wrote:


Now was there anything else you wished to look stupid about?

Hummmm?

VBG

Gunner


You certainly are adroit at changing the subject, aren't you.

The discussion was whether one can believe Gunner after he has said
that the President is required to tell the truth but that the rest of
the world isn't.... I notice that you have edited the thread to
remover your remarks and then made the suggestion to brows the thread.
Nice one. Very much as the Russians you attempt to edit history to fit
your needs.

But to return to the original discussion, is there a need to believe
Gunner after he has confirmed that as he is not president there is no
need for him to tell the truth?
Cheers,

John B.


Actually Jonnie...I take it you havent read the thread subject line have
you?

The subject is whether or not the Obamassiah is legally the President of
the USA or not. Its hardly about me.

Now Im not sure why you keep trying to divert the thread over and over
again to me..but as I said above...it does appear you are not done
making yourself look very stupid.

Now was there anything ELSE you wished to look stupid about? Or are you
trying to run up Stupidity Points for the grand prize?

Gunner


--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".