On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:56:04 +0700, john B.
wrote:


Johnny...they have indeed presented it to many courts of law. And nearly
ALL of the courts have refused to hear it. Would you want to be the
judge that was responsible for the removal of a US president?


Why not. After all that is what they threatened Agnew with -
prosecution for taking bribes - and he believed that they would. The
people who were set to get rid of Clinton, Nixon and Johnson certainly
weren't afraid.

Agnew wasnt a Democrat...was he? Hummm?

And Clinton had a solidly Republican Congress..and they certainly didnt
impeach him now did they? Hummmm?

Several courts have not refused to hear it..and have ruled that the
state of Hawaii is required to present Obamas birth cert.

So far..Hawaii has....refused.

For someone who posts..you sure dont seem to know much about the
subject.

Odd that, eh wot?

Gunner

sorry, wrong again.

If you are referring to the US District Court in Honolulu you are not
correct.

What actually happened was that the judge, Richard L. Puglisi, issued
an order that required the Hawaii Department of Health appear in
federal court Sept. 14 to show cause why Taitz should be prevented
from seeing whatever original 1961 documents the agency has on record
regarding Barack Obama's birth.

This is somewhat different from what you said. No demand to present
any certificates was made.

It is an order to show cause only. If the Department of Health cannot
show cause then the next step is the issuance of an order to disclose
the document.

You have, as they say, got the cart before the horse.

Cheers,

John B.

Incorrect. As they say...the horse is on the proper end..despite your
hopes and dreams of change.....VBG

The July 5 subpoena granted Taitz by the U.S. District Court for the
District of Hawaii was supposed to allow her to examine the original
1961 Obama birth certificate:

The Department of records REFUSED to allow her to see it as a "privacy
matter"

This despite the alleged PUBLIC release of the birth cert in question.

So now its been taken back to the District Court for enforcement.

The sad part of it is...that a visual examination probably wont be able
to determine if the newly manufactured fraudulant document is real or
not. Im sure the Obama has paid someone in the No Such Agencies to
generate a decent forgery this time. Its been long enough since July
to have done this neatly.


Read mo Court tells Hawaii officials to explain Obama's birth records
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=331517#ixzz1WXXjDLg4

--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".