On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:00:48 -0400, Stuart Wheaton
wrote:

On 8/29/2011 3:08 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:59:48 +0700, john
wrote:


Go back and read the quotation - which was the court's not mine. You
will see that the court felt that unless the order is "manifestly
beyond the legal power or discretion of the commander as
to admit of no rational doubt of their unlawfulness" it is up to the
Troops to obey.

When it is proven that the Commander in Chief is not legally allowed to
make those commands, its within the duties of each military member to
refuse them.

No further reading is necessary.

Unless you think the Nuremburg Trials were a farce?

The birthers are a farce. Mr. Obama has been proven, many times over
and by many independent means, to be fully eligible to be president.
And fully capable compared to what the republicans offered in the same
election.


Given the Republican's apparent efforts to block whatever the
President does it is logical to think that if there was any real doubt
that he was unqualified to serve that they would not have been all
over it. But they haven't.

If, during the primaries, it could have been proved that he was
ineligible to serve how much would the Clinton's paid to make that
public. But they haven't.

If the Birthers actually have proof that Obama was not born in the
U.S. one has to wonder why they haven't presented it to a court of
law. But they haven't.

Cheers,

John B.