On 08/26/2011 08:17 PM, john B. wrote:


Interesting. Given that he has sworn an oath to obey orders of the
President and the officers placed over him. I wonder how he equates
that with Obama's possession, or lack thereof, of a birth certificate,
as until removed from office he is still the president.

Make that "lawful orders".

See oath at
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joini...thofenlist.htm

and Uniform Code of Military Justice

892. ART. 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION

Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;

(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or

(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

The requirement for the order to be lawful is discussed at:

http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/milit...yingorders.htm

and references the trial of First Lieutenant William Calley for
following an unlawful order.

If President Obama is not qualified to be president by birth,
his orders as Commander in Chief are unlawful.

But read the cites and make up your own mind.



technomaNge
--
Dumbasses everywhere I look.