Evan wrote:

It is more than just slathering on make up powders... Theatre and
film make-up
often uses prosthetics and plaster casting as well as extensive use of
air brush
application methods...

Not to mention the chemicals involved as well as being able to
recognize an
adverse/allergic reaction if one is happening...

Still think that make-up artists shouldn't be licensed ?


No, they should not be licensed. Your examples of disaster have nothing to
do with licensing - they are adverse consequences of insufficient training
and experience (plus mathematical probability), which have no necessary
connection to the license. Further, the cost and discouragement of the
licensing process more than outweighs any possible benefit that would
accrue.

Have you ever strolled through the makeup section of a large department
store? If so, how do you feel about the manufacturer's representatives who
hawk: "Here, try this blush" or "Care to sample this new perfume?" Are these
promoters "make-up artists"? Should they be licensed?

After all, one in ten million might drop dead from an allergic reaction!