Harry K ) writes:
On Jul 28, 8:01=A0am, "HeyBub" wrote:
wrote:

Show ONE repeatable experiment in the climate researcher's quiver.

Silly.

The warming effect of CO2 can be tested in experiments all day long.
Fill a tank with air add light, then vary amount of CO2, measure the
temperature.

The above line of reasoning is attempting to confuse the reader
because climate science makes predictions and the future only happens
once.

Even with that, there's a new result to measure every day and many
places to do the measurement.

Very silly.

But what happens when the observations don't line up with the
experimental/simulation/predicted data? A new report, just out today, sho=
ws:

Money quotes:
* Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space
than alarmist computer models have predicted

* The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than Unit=
ed
Nations computer models have predicted


snip

So even the denialist report admits that GW _is_ happening. Clue.
Science changes it's predications as date shows it is necessary.


GW already happened, didn't you know... it's what eliminated the
last 'Ice Age' (12,000 years ago), and it was fast, relative to how
long it took for glaciation. The period which follows ice ages are
called 'Inter Glacial Periods', the period we are in now. A time line
of temperature (with low resolution) since the last ice age (after the
fast, large rise), is a flat horizontal line. With resolution... it's up
and down with a flat horizontal trend.

You need a better glue on your labels... they keep falling off.




Harry K