On Jul 27, 8:12*pm, wrote:
"HeyBub" writes:
DGDevin wrote:
"HeyBub" *wrote in message
...

You're right. The problem is that scientific truth is not determined
by majority vote. The climate researchers use scientific methods and
thereby claim their endeavors are science.

As opposed to folks who will go on insisting the earth is flat based
on their political or religious beliefs. *I think I'll give the edge
to the scientists in the credibility dept. *Which isn't to say
they're never wrong, but compared to the corporate whores and
religious whackos, the scientific community is just more believable.

You misunderstand. Just using parts of the scientific method does not make
the endeavor science.

For example, a significant part of the scientific method is that
"researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design
experimental studies to test these hypotheses via predictions which can be
derived from them. These steps must be repeatable, to guard against mistake
or confusion in any particular experimenter."

Show ONE repeatable experiment in the climate researcher's quiver.

Silly.

The warming effect of CO2 can be tested in experiments all day long.
Fill a tank with air add light, then vary amount of CO2, measure the
temperature.

The above line of reasoning is attempting to confuse the reader because
climate science makes predictions and the future only happens once.

Even with that, there's a new result to measure every day and many
places to do the measurement.

Very silly.

--
Dan Espen- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep silly but that is all the deniers have in their arsenal.

Harry K