"HeyBub" writes:

Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

Except that the employees were _already_ covered w/ health care at
less cost and higher benefits than are allowed under the new rules
so that in fact they have less care available and higher costs than
before.

--

Except since they were covered with health care already, and that
health care meets the minimums, which you acknowledge, they wouldn't
incur any additional charges

(Giggle)

What about the bar down the street that doesn't cover his employees. Those
employees will get coverage from tax money. And where will that tax money
come from?

Employers that don't currently pay for coverage will have to.
The premiums will come partly from the employer, partly from the
employee. If there is tax money involved, I believe it plays a minor
role.

But that's not the question you should be asking.

Currently if one of those uncovered bar employees gets cancer or has a car
accident, who pays for their treatment?

--
Dan Espen