wrote:

Show ONE repeatable experiment in the climate researcher's quiver.

Silly.

The warming effect of CO2 can be tested in experiments all day long.
Fill a tank with air add light, then vary amount of CO2, measure the
temperature.

The above line of reasoning is attempting to confuse the reader
because climate science makes predictions and the future only happens
once.

Even with that, there's a new result to measure every day and many
places to do the measurement.

Very silly.

But what happens when the observations don't line up with the
experimental/simulation/predicted data? A new report, just out today, shows:

Money quotes:
* Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space
than alarmist computer models have predicted

* The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United
Nations computer models have predicted

* supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide
trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

* real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple
assumptions fed into alarmist computer models

* there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the
climate models show

* the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations
computer models predicted

* The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the
global warming debate

* atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not increasing in the manner
predicted by alarmist computer models

* carbon dioxide emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far less
heat than alarmist computer models have predicted

Article in Forbes:
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html

Research Paper (PDF, 11 pages)
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/8/1603/pdf