On Jul 23, 9:00*pm, "Ed Huntress" wrote:


Hey, did you forget? You're the one who keeps commenting about other people
agreeing with you about my comments.


I do not remember commenting on other people agreeing with me about
your comments. I do admit thinking that other people must be
agreeing, but think that hardly anyone has commented either way.



Well, then, Dan, keep making remarks about what's wrong with me and I'll
keep shooting back at you. As long as you keep it up, I will, too. I've
changed my ways and you're not getting away with it anymore.


I'll spell this one out for you. If you pay attention to the pile-on
methodology of the right wingers here, you would recognize my comment as a
parody of their style. It's a joke about the whole course of conversation,
or what passes for conversation, once a winger enters the conversation and
starts piling on with nasty, silly, irrelevant, meaningless remarks.


That might explain it. The truth is that I do not read most of the
messages by people that use anonymous nyms. I think they are beyond
help. You on the other hand are capable of good logical arguments and
I think should be above personal attacks when you can argue with
facts.

I should in fairness attack all the people who make nasty irrelevant
remarks. But then I would have to read all that crap, and life is too
short.

Dan
Ed Huntress