On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:38:44 -0700, RosemontCrest
wrote:

On 7/17/2011 7:21 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:16:34 -0700,
wrote:

On 7/17/2011 6:37 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:32:49 -0700,
wrote:

On 7/17/2011 4:20 PM, zzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Agreed, Pozidriv is good but it can't come close to Torx. I like the way the
bit holds onto the driver, too. It's great for awkward places.

How does a Torx bit "hold onto" the driver any better or differently
than any other bit with a hex shaft? Did you mean to type that you like
the way that Torx bits hold onto the fastener?

Yes, sorry. "...the Torx *screw* holds onto the driver"

Okay. I'll take that to mean that you like the way that Torx *bits* hold
onto Torx *screws* and that the *driver* has nothing to do with that
interface.

No, I meant driver. Perhaps you don't know what a screwdriver is?

I was assuming replaceable hex bits installed in a driver of some sort,
not necessarily a screwdriver, with the screw being held by the bit, not
the driver.

Even if you couldn't understand that a screwdriver is what is used to drive
screws, you're being an ass.

Yes, I know what is a screwdriver. Do you often punctuate statements in
the form of a question?

When it is a question, I generally end a sentence with a question mark, yes.
BTW, you answered the question. I would assume that you know that it was a
question. Why the surprise? Don't answer. That was a "rhetorical question"
(look it up).