You pay them good money for a reason.

We can't be right all the time.

-------------------
"Ed Huntress" wrote in message ...
I don't think that this one example is "proof" of anything about the EPA.
The proof I'm most interested in is how effective they are, and there's
plenty of that. You can find people, I'm sure, who can discuss their
efficiency. You might even find one who knows enough to talk about it, but
don't count on that happening on Usenet. d8-)

My general take on the EPA is that they have a very big job, with
pathetically meager resources to do it. So they paint a lot of things with a
broad brush, out of necessity, and they're constrained in every direction by
our principles of equal treatment and so on. I don't envy their position. I
do admire many of their results.

--
Ed Huntress