"CaveLamb" wrote in message
m...
Ed Huntress wrote:

You may be right, David, but Tawwwm likes to tickle himself with subtle
allusions. So you never know. But we do know that he casts a pretty big
net for his "enemies." So I asked a direct question.

I would have been more surprised if he'd given a direct answer.


Looked more like teasing/tormenting, Ed.

Or a perfect example of how polite conversation ended because
gentlemen quit wearing side arms...

Tell us what's "polite" about this, just from the last hour:

"...[Democrats] don't ever expect or demand a man of real honor to ever
obtain public office. Their low expectations are then easily met by any
leftist seeking public office. Obama's not the problem, he's just a symptom
of how low the Leftists will go."

"....and the rest of the immoral Leftist agenda."

There's intentional provocation and childish demonizing in one gratuitous
post from Tawwwm. All Democrats, roughly half of the citizens of this
country, are "leftists" to Tawwwwwwm, and they're all "immoral," with no
"honor." And he wasn't even trying.

You can let it go, letting him, and Gunner, and the other bullies run
roughshod, polluting the atmosphere with their venom, or you can give it
back to them when they start getting too loose with their insults, and
restore some balance. They seem to be worse when no one fires back, and they
start to think they can just get away with anything they please.

Tawwwwm obviously is someone who's used to getting his way -- it seems to be
a personality trait of his -- and he goes off on rants when someone objects
to his insults. He's done that with me as well as with others.

If you prefer to let it go, so be it. I don't.

--
Ed Huntress