HeyBub wrote:

So are you saying that customers with "demand meters" are billed
on the basis of their peak demand - a reading based on only a
few minutes worth of energy usage as seen over an entire billing
period?

How is that a fair or equitable way to bill a customer?


Because the cost to generate the electricity is small compared to
the cost to deliver the energy. The cost to deliver the energy,
in turn, is determined by the infrastructure needed (poles,
transformers, generation capability, etc.). A commercial customer
with even a short peak demand may require more infrastructure to
support that demand than dozens of residential customers.

So what would you consider or where would you place the threshold for
which demand metering should be used by a customer?

What monthly kwh usage would you consider "worthy" or significant enough
for an electricity supplier to use a demand meter to cover this
so-called significant cost of delivering this huge amount of brief peak
energy?

Would you consider, say, 2000 kwh? Would a single month's total usage
of 2000 kwh qualify a customer for a demand meter? Would 4 consecutive
months of 2000 kwh be the line-in-the-sand for putting a customer on a
demand meter?

http://www.nationalgridus.com/niagar...lec-demand.pdf

Demand meters for such small users are total bull****.

Anyone with a 100 amp, single-phase service that is using their service
at 50% for an entire month would tip the scale at a 4300 kwh bill.
Hardly what I'd call justified for utilizing 50% of the smallest
installable utility service.

How would you justify the infrastructure costs needed to supply such a
paltry service such that demand metering is needed?