On 2011-05-28, Tom Gardner w@w wrote:

"Gunner Asch" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2011 17:59:02 -0500, Ignoramus23924
wrote:

On 2011-05-25, Tom Gardner w@w wrote:

"Larry Jaques" wrote in
message
...
On Tue, 24 May 2011 20:42:20 -0500, Ignoramus1699
wrote:

On 2011-05-25, Tom Gardner w@w wrote:

"Ignoramus1699" wrote in
message
...

Agreed. An honest, mentally stable and intelligent person
would
be a
hugely helpful addition to the Republican party.

How about one in the Democrat party? They are quite lacking
too.

Our current president is not lacking in the above qualities.

I'll give you the intelligence, and a possible on the stability,
but
I
recommend that you stop following the party line on the honesty
part.
Jesus, Ig, read something other than DNC propaganda. Try a little
research. Our sitting President was a major factor behind the
housing
crisis. The Democratic Black Caucus, including Obama, was a major
force behind Fannie Mae giving homes to people who couldn't EVER
be
considered stable enough to make a -second- payment, let alone 30
years worth of 'em. He doesn't own up to that, either.

What substantial promises has he fulfilled since first
campaigning?
Which have shown him to be a prevaricator, such as the promise of
transparency in the Whitehouse?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/ here's a list
to
get
you started (likely not unbiased.)

Damnit, Ig. Read some of the things written about him and do your
own
research via known unbiased (hard to find) sources. You'll come
to
the
same conclusions I have: I'd trust him as far as I could throw
him
(and my spine is out of place at the moment. Chiro visit #4
coming
up.)


When you're in love, the object of your affection can do no wrong.
It's not a rational state of mind to be in. It's like when my dad
suggested I stop dating girls with tattoos and drug issues and I
was
blinded to the unhealthy aspects of those relationships by
infatuation. Later, I was shocked to find out he was right!
Sometimes you have to pee on the electric fence yourself, you
won't
believe external wisdom.

Nobody will convince Ig that Obama isn't a god, he has to pee on
that
fence for himself. But, the fact that he's interested in politics
means he will eventually find some indisputable information that
will
make him rethink his positions at least a little bit at first then
the
whole house of cards.



Actually, I changed my mind many times, based on facts that became
available. If I see anything that seriously proves that Obama does
not
have the personal integrity that he has (in my opinion), I will
easily
change my mind.

So far, what I hear, is hateful hissing of Republicans and
counterfeit
chain emails.

i

And you guys were bragging bout Iggys openmindedness....chortle...

Gunner, 50% of the "hissing" and 80% of falsified chain emails that I
referred to, came from you personally. So, I find your comment above to
be slightly amusing.


Why is anybody that disagrees with the fringe left agenda a "Hissing,
Hateful Republican"? It seems to me that anyone that disagrees with
the fringe-left agenda is simply "Not Mathematically Impaired". Maybe
I missed some math classes while earning my ME degree, it WAS a long
time ago...has math changed that much?

I find notions such as "we will balance the budget by collecting less
taxes and starting more wars", to be somewhat mathematically challenged.

i