DIYbanter - View Single Post

Doug Miller[_2_]

In article , wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2011 01:14:20 GMT, (Doug
Miller) wrote:

So you are now saying that proof is indeed needed?

What on earth did you imagine you read that led to you conclude that?

So you are then claiming that no proof of natural born ciitzenship is
needed?

Stop changing the subject.

No..you are refusing to engage in dialog.

No, actually, that would be you -- refusing to respond to a simple request:
prove your claim that candidates are required to produce birth certificates.

You can't do that, and you know it, so you keep changing the subject, trying
to distract attention, anything to avoid admitting that you were wrong.