Thread: Referendum
View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
John Williamson John Williamson is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,842
Default Referendum

Mark wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2011 00:19:27 +0100, "Thumper"
wrote:

"Roger Mills" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/2011 13:05, Thumper wrote:
I'll be voting No because it is actually the fairer system. Each voter
gets 1 vote, votes are added up, candidate with most votes is the
winner. Can't get more fairer than that.

Excpet that:
* Most of the MPs it returns have more people voting *against* than *for*
them, and

You can only vote for someone, not against. And under the AV system it's
possible that a candidate with even less votes that a FPTP winner, will be
elected


Extremely unlikely. Under AV the winner will almost always have 50%
of the vote. This does not happen very often under FPTP.

As that's the definition of the way AV works, then yes the wiiner will
have to have more than half the votes cast. But that's over half the
people who listed the winner *anywhere* on their list of preferences,
not over half the voters wanting that candidate to win.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.