DIYbanter - View Single Post

Gunner Asch[_6_]

On Mon, 02 May 2011 12:10:25 GMT, (Doug
Miller) wrote:

In article , wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 03:26:29 GMT, (Doug
Miller) wrote:

In article ,
wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 01:58:26 GMT, (Doug
Miller) wrote:

In article ,

wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 00:34:07 GMT, (Doug
Miller) wrote:

In article , Rich Grise
wrote:
Doug Miller wrote:

Show me where the Constitution says a candidate for President needs to
produce his birth certificate. That's what you claimed, after all.
Let's
see the proof.

Well, a real birth certificate is pretty much good enough proof that he's

a natural born citizen, no?

You're missing the point rather badly, I'm afraid. Gummer claimed that
candidates are required to provide their birth certificates.

That simply isn't true.

Doug..they are required to prove where they were born.

That's not true. If you claim it is, prove it, or STFU.

Prove that they are not.

1. I don't have to. *You* made the claim, *you* prove it's true.

2. Even though I don't have to, I already did. I posted a link to the full
text of the U.S. Constitution, which contains no such requirement.

Ive posted the links to the Citation process from each party..and the
refusal of Hawaii to certify the Obamassiah, contrary to every year on
record prior to 2008

Dont like the implications?

Tough.

Keep dancing, Gummer, keep changing the subject, anything to avoid admitting
that you were wrong.

Seems Doughy is in denial that there is any change at all that the
Obamassiahs birth cert is another fake.

Must be nice to live in such a strange and deranged world. Do the
butterflys talk to you when you go out for a walk in it?

GUnner

--
"If I say two plus two is four and a Democrat says two plus two is eight,
it's not a partial victory for me when we agree that two plus two is
six. " Jonah Goldberg (modified)