On Apr 28, 2:51*pm, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Apr 28, 2:23*pm, The Ghost in The Machine
wrote:
On Apr 28, 1:52*pm, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:07*pm, The Ghost in The Machine
wrote:
On Apr 28, 11:24*am, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Apr 28, 3:44*am, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:33:48 GMT, Red Green
wrote:
Someone posted a bit back the eagle cam link in VA. I've checked it on and
off since. Some bad news. Mother was killed by a plane. Little ones OK but
moved so they survive.
http://www.wvec.com/my-city/norfolk/US-120702329.html
What a ****ing *******...
The pilot of that plane should be arrested and charged with murder. *I
hope he gets a life sentence.
What in either the article or the video leads you to place the blame
on the pilot?
I was watching a Flying Wild Alaska episode where a bush pilot was
involved in a bird strike. The bird was no where to be seen until a
split second before the strike. There was no time to avoid it.
We've all heard of bird strikes bringing down planes. Do you really
think that the pilots would have struck the birds if they had any
chance of avoiding them?
If a nimble bush plane can't avoid a bird strike, I seriously doubt a
US Airways regional jet on approach can.
THAT's MESSED UP...HOW MANY MAJESTIC BIRDS DO YOU SUPPOSE WILL GET
KILLED BEFORE THEY BRING DOWN ANOTHER AIRPLANE ? *MAYBE ITS NATURAL
VENGEANCE ;-/
ALL I AM SAYING IS AIR TRAVEL ROUTES SHOULD BE MORE CONSCIENTIOUS OF
THESE BIRDS...IF THEY WANDER INTO AN AIRPORT THEN THEY MUST BE
EXTERMINATED OR REMOVED SOMEHOW TO PROTECT PEOPLE,, BUT PLANES SHOULD
NOT FLY OVER KNOWN EAGLE GROUNDS & NESTING AREAS.
TGITM- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
"ALL I AM SAYING IS AIR TRAVEL ROUTES SHOULD BE MORE CONSCIENTIOUS
OF
THESE BIRDS..."
You are full of bird crap.
That isn't all you are saying. You also shouted in your friggin'
annoying all-upper-case style that you agree that the pilot should be
fined and charged.
That ranks right up there with the rest of the stupid things you shout
about.
Let's see if I've got this right...
If a majestic bird "wanders" into an airport it's OK to exterminate
it, but it must be done before the bird begins to nest. Once it begins
to nest, the area becomes a "known nesting area" and all flight paths
must be changed.
Who makes the call as to when the nesting process begins? If they spot
the bird before it begins to nest, who gets to exterminate it?
OH SHUT UP FOOL...YOU'RE EITHER FOR THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE OR
YOU'RE NOT.
I was referring to those big dumb mutt birds that bring down air
planes., not The Eagles.
STOP PESTERING YOURSELF ABOUT METHOD...YOU WILL NOT WIN.
TGITM- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
"I was referring to those big dumb mutt birds that bring down
airplanes., not The Eagles."
You don't even know what you wrote.
Here, allow me to explain what you said....
First you shouted in your friggin' annoying all-upper-case style:
"HOW MANY MAJESTIC BIRDS DO YOU SUPPOSE WILL GET KILLED BEFORE THEY
BRING DOWN ANOTHER AIRPLANE?"
Then you shouted in your friggin' annoying all-upper-case style:
"ALL I AM SAYING IS AIR TRAVEL ROUTES SHOULD BE MORE CONSCIENTIOUS OF
THESE BIRDS..."
Note your use of the words "these birds". Since there was no other
type of birds mentioned, you must have been referring to the "majestic
birds", the subject of your previous paragraph.
You followed that sentence immediately by shouting in your frigging
annoying all-upper-case style:
"IF THEY WANDER INTO AN AIRPORT THEN THEY MUST BE EXTERMINATED..."
"They" refers to "these" and "these" refers to the "majestic birds",
i.e. the eagles.
You said it, not me.
Besides, even if we gave you the benefit of the doubt and allowed you
to convince us that you were talking about "those big dumb mutt birds"
and not the eagles, you yourself shouted in your friggin' annoying all-
upper-case style:
"YOU'RE EITHER FOR THE PROTECTION OF WILDLIFE OR YOU'RE NOT."
So, assuming you were talking about "those big dumb mutt birds", I
guess you don't consider them to be wildlife since you advocate
exterminating them.
If the "air travel routes should be more conscientious of these birds"
shouldn't that hold true for *all* birds, both mutts and majestics?
Either you're for the protection of wildlife or you're not.
BTW..how can a "route" be "conscientious"?
You really need to work on your English.
YOU NEED TO STOP ASSUMING I NEED TO WORK ON ANYTHING....THE ROUTE IS
CONSCIENTIOUS BY DESIGN...WHO DESIGNS OR DESIGNATES AN AIR ROUTE ???
TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS???
YOU??? GOD BLESS, LET THE DEVIL REJOICE.
IF AN ANIMAL SMALL OR BEASTLY IS CAUSING LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE....THEN
YES EXTERMINATE THE VARMINTS THEY ARE MURDERERS....IT IS CALLED
SURVIVAL.
HUMANE IS NOTHING IF NOT A CAUSE OF HAPPINESS AND WELLNESS FOR HUMANS.
TGITM