In article , Phil Allison wrote:

"Don Klipstein the Troll"

Why would that be, in your words, "totally irrelevant"

** You posted under my words and it was not relevant to them.

You snipped the relevance.

Why would the solution be deploying a capacitor, rather than repairing
the poor connection or deploying a voltage-dependent spike-absorbing
device such as an MOV?

** A suitable MOV is also a possible solution.

So, why should I get merely "also a possible solution" after part
numbers for capacitor part numbers were digged up?

You still have not read all my posts in this thread.

I have endured doing that, though I prefer to not waste time at
contaminating Usenet with wasting time to responding to even the posts of
yours that I don't find deserving a response.

So, why should we hear about problems about that from only one customer
blowing 3 of them?

** Stop making silly stuff up - you pathetic ******.

Do you claim that the transformer customer blew fewer than 3? Do you
claim that the disappointed transformer customer is not alone?

If so, post support to your claims!

Why should 1 uF protect the trannies in question ...

** Already answered.

( snip bull**** story)

Keep on ignoring the evidence in the photos and you will never get close to
what sort of failure has occurred.

However, it was already explained to me clearly that the photo'ed tranny
showed charring evidence of severe primary overcurrent. What do you
expect to gain from me, or against me, if I take the time to look at the
photos that this thread gave me graphic descriptions of?

Facts are just like water off a ducks back to you - Don.

Co you fools like you believe whatever they ****ing feel like.
--
- Don )