"PrecisionmachinisT" wrote in message
newsI2dnVQ3H7_EBQbQnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@scnresearch. com...

"Ed Huntress" wrote in message
...

"Rich Grise" wrote in message
...
rangerssuck wrote:

If the law allows SOME vehicles (police cars, fire trucks, ambulances)
to exceed the speed limit, should it allow ALL vehicles to do so?

By what strange mental twist do you equate Obama's liberal unionist
buddies
to "police cars, fire trucks, ambulances"?

What makes them so special? Whose life are they on the way to save,
other
than their own greed?

Thanks,
Rich

The fact is that they work for big companies, many of which are
self-insured (it may say Blue Cross on your card, but it isn't), and many
of which have put benefit limits on their employees that are lower than
the amount permitted under the Affordable Care Act. Forcing those
companies to increase their costs while the economy is still weak would
hurt *lots* of jobs.

How about you? What is it about your insurance that would qualify you for
an exemption?



What is it that makes you think Rich even HAS insurance ?

That is an open question. But assuming he does, it would be good to know
what he thinks is happening to his costs under the ACA, and therefore what
would justify an exemption.

But I don't seriously expect an answer. Rich, like most of the other
righties, just salute whenever they read some right-wing polemic, and then
jerk their knees so high they do a backflip.

I think Gunner just strained a tendon between his ears on the debt issue,
for example. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress