On Apr 5, 8:17*am, Rich Grise wrote:
rangerssuck wrote:

Rich - You do realize, don't you, that the anecdote about the public's
misconception about the funding of CPB was meant to highlight the
absurdity of your quest for a waiver, don't you? You did read Ed's
explanation of the waivers, didn't you?

What, exactly, is "absurd" about wanting equal treatment under the law.

If Obama's union handlers can have a waiver, howcome the law discriminates
against me? Or you, for that matter. If the law allows for _some_ people
to have a waiver, it should allow _all_ people to have a waiver, otherwise
it violates the "equal protection" provision of the Constitution.

Hope This Helps!
Rich

Rich -

If the law allows SOME vehicles (police cars, fire trucks, ambulances)
to exceed the speed limit, should it allow ALL vehicles to do so? Your
"equal protection" allows you to request a waiver. It does not
obligate the government to issue said waiver, unless you meet the same
criterea as the other applicants whose waivers were issued.

Now, while we're at it - It has been widely reported that GE paid no
income tax last year. Gunner has also reported that he paid no income
tax. Where's MY free ride?