"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dennis@home wrote:


"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dennis@home wrote:
Last time I insured a car from scratch, in 2008, fully comprehensive
was cheaper than third party, fire and theft, and both quotes were
through the same broker on the same phone call.

How does *that* make sense?

Different insurers. There are a lot of insurers that don't do RTA,
they think people that want RTA are a poor risk.

RTA is not the same as TPF&T.

I don't see anyone saying they are.

Then what did you mean?

What I said.
I could have said TPF&T but then I would have been talking about something
else about which I don't have any recent experience.
I would imagine what I said about RTA applies to TPF&T but unless I look I
can't be sure.