"Charles Bryant" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dennis@home wrote:
}"Charles Bryant" wrote in message
...
} In article ,
} Skipweasel wrote:
} }Tackling no insurance is a lot easier - and probably cheaper. I'm not
} }sure why you have such an aversion to it.
}
} Because driving without insurance cannot by itself harm anyone except
} the insurance companies.
}
}All drivers (can) make mistakes.
}If you aren't insured you can still be sued and have to pay.

Only if you crash and are held to be at fault. Lack of insurance *by
itself* cannot harm anyone.

It is harming me as I have to pay more for my insurance (even though I have
only ever had a claim for a stolen radio in more than a million miles).


}If you don't want to insure your own goods then buy RTA only.

I suggest you look at the price of it - in particular the price in
comparison to comprehensive for the same driver.

That depends on how bad a driver you are (or are thought to be) and how
stupid the car is.