View Single Post
  #90   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
John Stumbles John Stumbles is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,982
Default Wind output reaches new low..

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:57:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

No, you don't. You need a 10 year stockpile of uranium.


I think the problem is that with current technology there isn't enough
uranium to generate anything like the amounts of power we need in non-
breeder Uranium-cycle reactors[1]. Fast breeders could get close to a
useful sustainable energy output[2] but are still relatively unproven and
expensive. Thorium looks promising (to the Chinese, who are not known for
soft-headedness in economic matters) but is still pretty speculative
technology.

Ironically what both (current technology) nuclear and wind (and many
other renewables such as PV, wave and tide) have in common, when used for
electricity generation, is that they really need some form of storage, or
quick-response (and inevitably fossil-fuelled) fill-in generation
capacity. However as oil gets more expensive we may find ourselves using
electricity for oil-replacement technology such as hydrogen where storage
over a period of weeks is much more feasible, and obviously renewables
such as wind would be a good match for that.

Whilst the ideal major source of non-fossil energy is perhaps something
like Thorium which would seem to avoid the problems of restricted supply,
horrendous long-term (circa million years) radioactive waste management
and proliferation potential, that's going to take realistically at least
a couple of decades to develop and roll out[3]. In the meantime we *can*
with today's technology generate useful amounts of non-fossil energy from
renewables.


[1] According to Prof David Mackay in his 'Sustainable Energy - Without
The Hot Air' we can't sustainably fuel our existing installed base of
once-through Uranium fission reactors with existing land-based sources of
Uranium:
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/w...page_162.shtml

[2] 33kWh per day per person according to MacKay, which would almost do
for our current space heating and cooling consumption:
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/w...page_103.shtml

[3] or, longer term, obviously, fusion

--
John Stumbles

Never believe anyone who claims to be a liar