View Single Post
  #58   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
harry harry is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,188
Default Japan Nuclear Problem

On Mar 17, 11:15*am, Tim Streater wrote:
In article ,
*The Natural Philosopher wrote:





Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote:
On 17/03/2011 01:02, Doctor Drivel wrote:


"Tim Streater" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Doctor Drivel" wrote:


"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message
newspKdnUy856E5ah3QnZ2dnUVZ8mednZ2d@giganews .com...
On 16/03/2011 17:25, harry wrote:
...
It was the tsunami really f***d things up. We have had tsunamis in
the
UK. We have nuclear power stations on the coast. too. Don't think it
couldn't happen here.


So what? If we build more stations they will be third generation
and will not need the generators that were the critical things
destroyed by the tsunami.


This man is barking mad.


Errm, could you kindly explain why? I don't see it myself.


"We have nuclear power stations on the coast. too. Don't think it
couldn't happen here." He replies: "So what?"


Clearly barking.


Perhaps, instead of waving your hands in the air and shouting we are all
doomed, you would like to provide a detailed anaylsis of the effects on
any of our existing or projected nuclear power plants of a tsunami such
as those reported in the Wikipedia article. You could also describe the
effects of the much more probable event of a tidal surge, such as hit
the Sounth Coast about 30 years ago or as devastated the East Coast in
1953.


The Safety and Reliability Directorate of the AEA has, of course,
already done this, along with such other unlikely events as the risk of
being hit by a meteorite.


If that happens its Goodnight, Vienna an never mind a puddle of radiation.


You will note that Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are inhabited today.


And also that wildlife is flourishing in the Chernobyl exclusion zone.
It's only humans that aren't there.

--
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" *-- *Bill of Rights 1689- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


That's because most wildlife is short lived.